Filed under: Asia, Middle East | Tags: 2009 Election Iran, Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah, Ayatollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Montazeri, Bush Administration, CIA, CIA Destablization Plan, CIA orchestarated Protests, Color Revolution, Colour Revolution, Covert "black" Operation, Georgia, Iran, Iran Election 2009, Iran Protests, Iranian Government, Iranian Protests, Islamic Republic, Kenneth Timmerman, London telegraph, Military, military attack on Iran, Montazeri, Mousavi, National Endowment for Democracy, Neoconservative, New Yorker, popular revolution, Protests, Reactionary, Seymore Hersh, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Tehran, Ukraine, Washington
* * * * *
19-21 June 2009
A number of commentators have expressed their idealistic belief in the purity of Mousavi, Montazeri, and the westernized youth of Tehran. The CIA destabilization plan, announced two years ago (see below) has somehow not contaminated unfolding events.
The claim is made that Ahmadinejad stole the election, because the outcome was declared too soon after the polls closed for all the votes to have been counted. However, Mousavi declared his victory several hours before the polls closed. This is classic CIA destabilization designed to discredit a contrary outcome. It forces an early declaration of the vote. The longer the time interval between the preemptive declaration of victory and the release of the vote tally, the longer Mousavi has to create the impression that the authorities are using the time to fix the vote. It is amazing that people don’t see through this trick.
As for the grand ayatollah Montazeri’s charge that the election was stolen, he was the initial choice to succeed Khomeini, but lost out to the current Supreme Leader. He sees in the protests an opportunity to Continue reading