RACISM & NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS | NEWS/COMMENTARY


Bill C-51 Could be Used to Stifle Social and Environmental Movements, Accuse Citizen Media Groups of “Supporting Terrorism”

10954561_449823285169277_691666435200176349_n

Bill C-51, if made into law, might make this article and a good part of the activities of my, and other citizen media groups, acts of supporting Terrorism. And some of you engaged citizens reading this, Terrorists. If we get adjoining cells… I hope you don’t snore.

The clear intent of this bill is to stifle social, environmental and Indigenous justice movements in Canada. And in the specific wording of the Bill we see measures designed to treat those that take action on  social issues in Canada like terrorists and those in the growing independent media that cover them as enemy propagandists. It is important to remember when reading the language of the proposed legislation that the terminology used by security services toward activists of any stripe in this country has changed in a way that make this legislation a perfect fit for repression

The Conservatives are counting on Canadians ignorance of the fact that if you attend a rally to save your local forest you have  likely observed, identified and added to the list of « multi-issue extremists ». And this has been a fact for many years. In 2007 the RCMP and other security services started referring to activists in this way.  A peaceful march or banner drop is a « non violent attack strategy ». This is a very deliberate move to be able to easily define those who protest or are socially active within the bounds of the Harper governments anti-terror laws. A non – exhaustive list of groups already deemed a threat and monitored by RCMP would include Idle No More, ForestEthics, Sierra Club, EcoSociety, LeadNow, Dogwood Initiative, Council of Canadians and the People’s Summit, according to documents obtained under FOI requests by Professors Kevin Walby and Jeffrey Monaghan. Documents they obtained further stated that

“The Canadian law enforcement and security intelligence community have noted a growing radicalized faction of environmentalists who advocate the use of criminal activity to promote the protection of the natural environment,” according to a 2011 report obtained by the Vancouver Observer “It is highly probable that environmentalists will continue to mount direct actions targeting Canada’s energy sector, specifically the petroleum sub-sector and the fossil and nuclear fueled electricity generating facilities, with the objectives of: influencing government energy policy, interfering within the energy regulatory process and forcing the energy industry to cease its operations that harm the environment,”

Some of the provisions of the Bill C-51 seem aimed at making it easier to target, and criminalize, organizers individually and disrupt their work. We have a long experience here in Montréal, laboratory for the police state in Canada, of police levelling « conditions » on activists. The conditions used already under Montréal’s anti-constitutional P6 bylaw seem set for export to the rest of Canada. These conditions can prevent activists from meeting with certain people, organizing or attending actions and from physically being in large geographical areas, like the downtown of their own city. The new Bill may even make it illegal for them to talk about, or report on others’ activities. This is intended to destroy resistance communities by depriving them of key organizers and the tools that transformed social movements in the late 20th century.

This Bill, if made law, would for the first time potentially allow the government to rein in the expanding alternative media in this country and clamp down on activists use of social media to either organize or report on actions that involve even the smallest form of civil disobedience. Similar laws generally making it illegal to « glorify or promote terrorism » are already on the books in the UK and Australia even though legal scholars in both countries deplore them.  When you combine this wording with the fact that the government classifies and refers to activists  as extremists,  it would be potentially illegal for me to continue to report on the activities of groups like Idle No More or the anti-pipeline protesters. It could be used to prevent 99media.org and other organizations from live streaming the demonstrations this spring, for the anticipated general mobilization against austerity here in Quebec and elsewhere. I would probably have been jailed for the work I did covering the « Printemps Érable » in 2012. Just for the record Mr Harper, and I think I speak for my entire group here, I will stop reporting on the dedicated activists struggling to make this country and the world better, and leave the street, when you drag my corpse off it. No compromise.

The Government obviously understands the power that independent media, and social media have in nurturing and promoting Indigenous, environmental, and social justice movements and are moving to limit its effect. If allowed to go forward, this legislation, coupled with the masses of anti-terror legislation already put on the books since 9/11, would give the government exceptional power to crush dissent in a « legal » manner.

If this all sounds like sweaty basement internet fantasy to you, then you should familiarize yourself with « Operation Profunc, » an RCMP led operation that for 40 years collected the names of social activists. There were plans to simultaneously arrest them,  imprison them and their families in « relocation camps ».  Don’t worry, keep moving, ze dogs are here for your protection. And any belief that the state wont do it again, is in error.

And it is not enough to trust that replacing the Harper government with beautiful Mr Trudeau will solve everything. Governments nowhere have much of a record of repealing control legislation on the books, no matter what they say. You need look no further than old Barrack “Guantanamo drone strike” Obama.

And if your looking for some hope in the Security Intelligence Review Committee controlling all of this, don’t. Harper’s latest appointment to this group, a man named Ian Holloway, is a former military. He is the current dean of the University of Calgary Law school, not exactly known as a hotbed of human rights. In 1996 he wrote a paper for the Australian Law revue titled, « I Stand For Liberty: Winston Churchill as Social Reformer ». Anyone who believes Winston was a reformer truly wouldn’t even understand the term « social justice ».

So in case I’m not in enough trouble I would heartily advocate calling your MP, calling the guy who wants to be your MP and anyone else and, yes, taking to the streets. Let the powers that be in Canada know that we  are not afraid. And that we will NEVER Trade our liberty for Mr Harper, or anyone’s promise of security.

My friend Clifton Nicholas, Mohawk activist and film maker was called by CSIS. He was questioned simply because he had been to Greece at the invitation of Greek social groups to speak on Canadian native issues. His response to the CSIS agent is beyond priceless.

By William Ray

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/canada-bill-c-51-could-make-activities-of-activists-and-citizen-media-groups-acts-of-supporting-terrorism/5429060

Comments Off on Bill C-51 Could be Used to Stifle Social and Environmental Movements, Accuse Citizen Media Groups of “Supporting Terrorism”


Thomas Sankara |The Upright Man
October 10, 2011, 2:37 pm
Filed under: Africa, Europe, Global, Indigenous
Comments Off on Thomas Sankara |The Upright Man


G20 Toronto, First Nations March, June 2010
June 24, 2010, 11:31 pm
Filed under: "canada", Global, Indigenous, Local

Comments Off on G20 Toronto, First Nations March, June 2010


MALCOLM SPEAKS!
October 8, 2009, 7:34 am
Filed under: "canada", Africa, Global, Indigenous, Local, North America
Comments Off on MALCOLM SPEAKS!


Really, Harper: Canada has No History of Colonialism? | Harsha Walia
October 7, 2009, 1:03 pm
Filed under: "canada", Indigenous

* * * * *

28 September 2009

Source: The Dominion

At least the PM isn’t a history teacher

“We also have no history of colonialism…”
—Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

VANCOUVER—On the heels of a massive exercise of US police repression against G20 protestors, including use of a wartime sonic acoustic weapon also being used in Iraq, Stephen Harper made the above declaration. The comment came during a press conference in Pittsburgh where it was announced that Canada would be hosting the next G20 meeting in 2010.

Perhaps Harper and I are not on the same page—is colonialism not defined as the practice and processes of domination, control, and forced subjugation of one people to another? As most bluntly stated by Duncan Campbell Scott, Head of the Department of Indian Affairs in the 1920s: “Our objective is to continue until there is not a single Indian in Canada that has not been absorbed into the body politic and there is no Indian question.”

I expect Harper has read the federal government’s own report on the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, which explicitly lays out Canada’s imposition of a colonial relationship (indeed, that is the heading of one of the chapters) on Continue reading

Comments Off on Really, Harper: Canada has No History of Colonialism? | Harsha Walia


Mohawk protest continues into day three | Jeremy Ashley
June 13, 2009, 3:21 pm
Filed under: "canada", Indigenous, Local, North America

* * * * *

10 June 2009

Source: Belleville Intelligencer

TYENDINAGA TERRITORY — A phone call from a federal minister to native leaders in Akwesasne could spell the end of a three-day-old blockade here.

“It’s pretty simple, really,” mused Shawn Brant while leaning against a Tyendinaga police cruiser at the foot of the Skyway Bridge Tuesday — Day 3 of a blockabe by Brant and others here.

“The folks in Akwesasne aren’t asking for much — it could be something as simple as the minister (of Public Safety Peter Van Loan) calling back and saying ‘Hey, let’s get together and talk’ or ‘Hey, I’m returning your call.’”

If that were to happen, there would be a good chance the blockade of the local bridge — which spans the Bay of Quinte, linking Prince Edward County to Deseronto — would be taken down, the protest organizer said.

Brant and as many as two dozen protesters blocked both sides of Continue reading

Comments Off on Mohawk protest continues into day three | Jeremy Ashley


A voice from the Akwesasne border standoff: ‘Start listening to Mohawk people’ | Jesse Freeston
June 13, 2009, 12:34 pm
Filed under: "canada", Indigenous, Local, North America

* * * * *

10 June 2009

Source: Rabble

CORNWALL, ON — For nine days the border crossing that spans the St. Laurence River between Cornwall, ON and Massena, NY has been inoperable. On the North side, Canadian authorities have blockaded the Seaway Bridge, while their U.S. equivalents do the same on the South shore of the river. On the island in the middle stands a community in protest.

The community of Awkesasne, part of the Kahniakehaka (Mohawk) Nation, has unified in resistance to the Canadian Federal Government’s plan to arm its border guards with 9mm pistols. The guns were set to appear on June 1, but Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) guards walked off their posts at midnight on May 30 in response to a non-violent protest by members of the Akwesasne community. Since then the bridges have been sealed and the feds have refused to speak with community representatives.

Only Akwesasne community members are being permitted to cross the North-side blockade, while U.S. police maintain a total blockade from the Continue reading

Comments Off on A voice from the Akwesasne border standoff: ‘Start listening to Mohawk people’ | Jesse Freeston